Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 23 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Yadkin Valley Bank & Trust Co. v. McGee (In re Hutchinson).
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Yadkin Valley Bank & Trust Co. v. McGee (In re Hutchinson) Anchor | green | “although the code does not define the term 'party in interest,' the term 'is generally understood to include all persons whose pecuniary interests are directly affected by the bankruptcy proceedings.” | 15 |
| 2 | Zenter GBV Fund IV, LLC v. Vesper | green | “be interpreted very narrowly to refer only to a specific request for an official vote either accepting or rejecting a plan ... the terms do not encompass discussions, exchanges of information, negotiations, or tentative arrangements....” | 5 |
| 3 | In re Fairmont General Hospital, Inc. | green | “a court reviews a rule 9019 motion to compromise against 'the outcome of four factors: (1) the probability of success in litigation; (2) the likely difficulties in collection; (3) the complexity of the litigation involved, and the expense, inconvenience and delay necessarily att…” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.