Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 22 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Jennifer Krieger v. United States.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jennifer Krieger v. United States Anchor | green | “of course we are not bound to accept the government's concession when the point at issue is a question of law.” | 9 |
| 2 | United States v. Ruben Mancillas | green | “in order to proceed pro se, a defendant must 'clearly and unequiv ocally' raise the right to selfrepresentation.” | 5 |
| 3 | United States v. Ruben Mancillas | green | “to prevent a defendant from using an ambiguous waiver of the right to counsel as a tool to overturn his or her conviction.” | 5 |
| 4 | United States v. Patterson | green | “never properly requested that the district court vacate his guilty plea, we review for plain error.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.