Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 22 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Jaime Gonzalez v. Owens Corning.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jaime Gonzalez v. Owens Corning Anchor | green | “to assess whether predominance is met at the class certification stage, a district court must determine whether the essential elements of the claims brought by the putative class are 'capable of proof at trial through evidence that is common to the class rather than individual t…” | 18 |
| 2 | McDonough v. Toys" R" US, Inc. | green | “whether adequacy has been satisfied 'depends on two factors: (a) the plaintiff's attorney must be qualified, experienced, and generally able to conduct the proposed litigation, and (b) the plaintiff must not have interests antagonistic to those of the class.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.