Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 23 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State of Iowa v. Lavelle Lonelle McKinley.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State of Iowa v. Lavelle Lonelle McKinley Anchor | green | “we presume statutes or rules do not contain superfluous words.” | 6 |
| 2 | Anderson v. W. Hodgeman & Sons, Inc. | green | “where a party attempts to invoke the district court's appellate jurisdiction, compliance with statutory conditions is required for the court to acquire jurisdiction.” | 5 |
| 3 | Dwyer v. Clerk of District Court for Scott County | green | “the clerk of the district court is under a duty pursuant to subsection 602.8102(98) to file and note all documents presented to the clerk for filing. it is not the clerk's duty or function to rule on the validity or legal effect of the document so received.” | 3 |
| 4 | Concerned Citizens of Southeast Polk School District and Jessman Smith v. City Development Board of the State of Iowa | green | “remains the depository of court records” | 3 |
| 5 | Concerned Citizens of Southeast Polk School District and Jessman Smith v. City Development Board of the State of Iowa | green | “reveal that the process of electronic filing for the purpose of identifying the date of filing is geared to the filing of the order, not the date of the notice of filing.” | 3 |
| 6 | Jeremie J. Cooksey v. Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation | green | “we review the granting of a motion to dismiss for errors at law.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.