Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 canonical passages across 8 cases, quoted by 48 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Burke v. 12 Rothschild's Liquor Mart, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Burke v. 12 Rothschild's Liquor Mart, Inc. Anchor | green | “willful and wanton conduct is found where an act was done with actual intention or with a conscious disregard or indifference for the consequences when the known safety of other persons was involved.” | 9 |
| 2 | Taluzek v. Illinois Central Gulf Railroad | green | “the error was substantially prejudicial and affected the outcome of the case.” | 7 |
| 3 | Nolan v. Weil-McLain | green | “we must determine if that error is harmless or reversible.” | 6 |
| 4 | Hall v. Village of Bartonville Police Department | green | “the officer did not act in disregard for the safety of others.” | 5 |
| 5 | Brennan v. Wisconsin Central Limited | green | “whether the 'essential conditions' or 'essential elements' of the experiment are substantially similar” | 5 |
| 6 | Hall v. Village of Bartonville Police Department | green | “alleging violations of department procedures, willful and wanton conduct, and reckless disregard for the safety of others.” | 4 |
| 7 | Galindo v. Riddell, Inc. | green | “when an experiment is not represented to be a reenactment of the accident and it deals with one aspect or principle directly related to the cause or result of the occurrence, the exact conditions of the accident need not be duplicated.” | 4 |
| 8 | Amstar Corp. v. Aurora Fast Freight | green | “we believe, therefore, that the court's discretion was not abused.” | 4 |
| 9 | Wilbourn v. Cavalenes | green | “party is not entitled to reversal based upon the trial court's evidentiary rulings unless the error substantially prejudiced the aggrieved party and affected the outcome of the case.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.