Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 53 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Robertson v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Robertson v. State Anchor | green | “errorless or perfect counsel whose competency of representation is to be judged by hindsight.” | 20 |
| 2 | Charles v. State | red | “presume that all reasonable factual findings that could have been made against the losing party were made against that losing party.” | 14 |
| 3 | Landers v. State | green | “the rationale for the change in the rule is to ensure that appellate courts will not need to speculate as to the possible factual findings supporting a trial judge's ruling if the trial judge will articulate them.” | 5 |
| 4 | Valdez v. State | green | “necessarily believed that the antecedent contact had occurred.” | 4 |
| 5 | Landers v. State | green | “in ruling on a motion for new trial, the court must not summarize, discuss, or comment on evidence.” | 4 |
| 6 | Ex Parte Martinez | green | “the failure to present evidence of the alleged sexual abuse is borne primarily by applicant, as he had ample opportunity to divulge this evidence to his lawyer ... before trial” | 3 |
| 7 | Ex parte Garcia | green | “first, an applicant must demonstrate deficient performance by showing that his attorney's representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness, as judged by prevailing professional norms.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.