Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 22 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Laugharn.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Laugharn Anchor | green | “the circuit court's dismissal short-circuited the proceedings and deprived the state of the time it was entitled to answer or otherwise plead.” | 11 |
| 2 | Albany Bank & Trust Co. N.A. v. Albany Bank & Trust Co. N.A. | green | “the notice requirements of rule 105 are designed to prevent a litigant from obtaining new or additional relief without first giving the defaulted party a renewed opportunity to appear and defend.” | 5 |
| 3 | People v. Carter | green | “prosecutors have a job to do and that job includes standing before the trial court and clearly and articulately stating the state's position regarding the matter at hand.” | 3 |
| 4 | People v. Alexander | green | “defendant now seeks to benefit by his failure” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.