Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 22 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Hill.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Hill Anchor | green | “that hill's self-care was 'poor but not terrible' and that hill had to be reminded sometimes about his hygiene.” | 4 |
| 2 | State v. Hill | green | “upon a careful review of the record, we can discern no coercive or overreaching tactics employed by the police during questioning.” | 4 |
| 3 | State v. Hill | green | “you don't necessarily have fingerprints on everything” | 4 |
| 4 | State v. Hill | green | “would at times physically discipline his nephew at the request of hill's mother.” | 4 |
| 5 | James O'Neal v. Margaret Bagley | green | “with expert testimony split, as it often is, the state court chose to credit dr. chiappone and dr. nelson over dr. tureen, and we cannot say from this vantage that it was unreasonable to do so.” | 3 |
| 6 | State v. Hill | green | “has a diminished mental capacity,” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.