Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 22 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Abu-Ali Abdur'Rahman v. Wayne Carpenter.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Abu-Ali Abdur'Rahman v. Wayne Carpenter Anchor | green | “has some merit and is debatable among jurists of reason.” | 15 |
| 2 | Elgene Porter v. Kevin Genovese | green | “a claim is insubstantial when 'it does not have any merit,' 'is wholly without factual support,' or when 'the attorney in the initial-review collateral proceeding did not perform below constitutional standards.” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.