Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 22 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Sun-Brite Car Wash, Inc. v. Board of Zoning & Appeals.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sun-Brite Car Wash, Inc. v. Board of Zoning & Appeals Anchor | green | “sustained special damage, different in kind and degree from the community generally” | 19 |
| 2 | Seidel v. Prendergast | green | “although the doctrine of common-law taxpayer standing . . . would excuse such lack of personal aggrievement, that doctrine requires a petitioner to establish that the failure to accord such standing would be in effect to erect an impenetrable barrier to any judicial scrutiny of …” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.