Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Bruce Coldiron v. Commissioner of Social Security.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bruce Coldiron v. Commissioner of Social Security Anchor | green | “an alj may accomplish the goals of the procedural requirement by indirectly attacking the supportability of the treating physician's opinion or its consistency with other evidence in the record.” | 12 |
| 2 | Hall v. Commissioner of Social Security | green | “the equivalent of good reasons for not adopting a treating source's opinion could perhaps be found in an alj's analysis of the ailment addressed by the opinion” | 5 |
| 3 | Nelson v. Commissioner of Social Security | green | “the goal of the rule even if not meeting its letter” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.