Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Native Ecosystems Council v. United States Forest Service.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Native Ecosystems Council v. United States Forest Service Anchor | green | “it is well-settled that the forest service's failure to comply with the provisions of a forest plan is a violation of nfma.” | 15 |
| 2 | Mitchell Smith, an Individual v. U.S. Forest Service, an Agency of the United States Vaagen Timber Products, a Washington Corporation | green | “at the very least, to acknowledge the existence of the 5,000 acre roadless area.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.