5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Fischer.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Fischer Anchor | green | “criminal statute of limitation is jurisdictional.” | 3 |
| 2 | State v. Bryce | green | “we reasoned that because a criminal statute of limitation is jurisdictional, an information which charges a crime beyond the statute of limitations is void on its face, and therefore, there is nothing to which an amendment can relate back.” | 3 |
| 3 | State v. Ansell | green | “the statute of limitation is jurisdictional.” | 3 |
| 4 | State v. Walker | green | “the statute of limitations in a criminal case is jurisdictional.” | 3 |
| 5 | State v. Walker | green | “the statute of limitations in a criminal case is jurisdictional.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.