Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Rader v. Montgomery County Department of Social Services.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rader v. Montgomery County Department of Social Services Anchor | green | “due process requires the trial courts to comply strictly with the statutory scheme for disposition of child custody cases.” | 8 |
| 2 | Stanley v. Fairfax County Department of Social Services | green | “the foster care plan documenting the need for termination can only be filed by the local board of public welfare or social services or the child welfare agency that has been given custody of the child.” | 7 |
| 3 | Martin v. Pittsylvania County Department of Social Services | green | “it is implicit in the statutory scheme . . . that the natural parent, at subsequent hearings concerning that child, is entitled to prior and specific notice of the disposition sought by the agency in whose custody a child has been placed.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.