Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Moises Zelaya-Veliz.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Moises Zelaya-Veliz Anchor | green | “identified the items to be seized by reference to the suspected criminal offenses.” | 3 |
| 2 | United States v. Jerod Askew | green | “construed as a whole, and in light of the whole record, adequately informed the jury” | 3 |
| 3 | Vasquez v. Dotson | neutral | “conspiracy to commit a murder requires only an agreement to commit a future murder that may or may not ever occur.” | 3 |
| 4 | United States v. Tarik Freitekh | green | “substantial evidence to support the verdict, after viewing all of the evidence and the inferences therefrom in the light most favorable to the prosecution.” | 3 |
| 5 | United States v. Ronald Contreras | green | “detailed the history, structure, and purpose of ms-13” | 3 |
| 6 | United States v. Ronald Contreras | green | “vicar requires the prosecution to prove the crimes were committed as part of a criminal enterprise and pursuant to a pattern of racketeering activity.” | 3 |
| 7 | United States v. Ronald Contreras | green | “we must refrain from making any credibility determinations.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.