Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 20 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from A/s J. Ludwig Mowinckles Rederi v. Tidewater Construction Corporation, Lone Star Industries, Inc. v. Gearbulk, Ltd..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A/s J. Ludwig Mowinckles Rederi v. Tidewater Construction Corporation, Lone Star Industries, Inc. v. Gearbulk, Ltd. Anchor | green | “district courts have broad discretion under f. r. civ. p. 42(a) to consolidate causes pending in the same district.” | 14 |
| 2 | Jerald H. Miller v. The United States Postal Service | green | “a motion to consolidate is not required; the court may invoke rule 42(a) sua sponte.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.