Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 20 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Bremmer v. Journal-Tribune Publishing Company.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bremmer v. Journal-Tribune Publishing Company Anchor | green | “the right of an individual to be let alone, to live a life of seclusion, to be free from unwarranted publicity.” | 7 |
| 2 | Winegard v. Larsen | green | “highly offensive to a reasonable person.” | 6 |
| 3 | Winegard v. Larsen | green | “intentional intrusion upon the solitude or seclusion of another which would be highly offensive to a reasonable person.” | 4 |
| 4 | Fields v. Atchison, Topeka, & Santa Fe Railway Co. | green | “both the manner of intrusion as well as the nature of the information acquired ... must rise to the level of being highly offensive to the reasonable person” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.