Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 20 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Hagen v. Hagen.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hagen v. Hagen Anchor | green | “in reviewing de novo equity cases, this court may modify otherwise final judgments to rectify mistakes, clarify and interpret ambiguities, and alleviate inequities.” | 5 |
| 2 | McCallister v. McCallister | green | “all the circumstances of the case” | 3 |
| 3 | Pohl v. Pohl | neutral | “an absolute duty to support the wife regardless of the circumstances of the husband.” | 3 |
| 4 | Schroeder v. Terra Energy, Ltd. | green | “while generally a course of performance is highly persuasive evidence of proper contract interpretation when introduced against the party so performing, the law also recognizes that a party may undertake a wrong interpretation of the words of a contract and the other party shoul…” | 3 |
| 5 | Ackerman v. Ackerman | green | “the main objective of spousal support is to balance the incomes and needs of the parties in a way that would not impoverish either party.” | 3 |
| 6 | Bialy v. Bialy | green | “whether either party is responsible for the support of others” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.