Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 20 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Marvin Lumber & Cedar Co. v. Norton Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Marvin Lumber & Cedar Co. v. Norton Co. Anchor | green | “the record supports a longstanding series of interactions, which have more likely than not coalesced to create a basic understanding of the retaining party's modus operandi, patterns of operations, decision-making process, and the like.” | 6 |
| 2 | English Feedlot, Inc. v. Norden Laboratories, Inc. | green | “courts have also expressed concern that if experts are too easily subjected to disqualification, unscrupulous attorneys and clients may attempt to create an inexpensive relationship with potentially harmful experts solely to keep them from the opposing party.” | 5 |
| 3 | English Feedlot, Inc. v. Norden Laboratories, Inc. | green | “the main policy objectives militating against disqualification are ensuring that parties have access to expert witnesses who possess specialized knowledge and allowing experts to pursue their professional calling.” | 5 |
| 4 | Mayer v. Dell | green | “discussion of the retaining party's strategies in the litigation, the kinds of experts the party expected to retain, the party's views of the strengths and weaknesses of each side, the role of each of the party's witnesses to be hired, and anticipated defenses.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.