Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 132 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer Anchor | green | “when the president acts pursuant to an express or implied authorization of congress, his authority is at its maximum, for it includes all that he possesses in his own right plus all that congress can delegate.” | 46 |
| 2 | Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer | green | “must stem either from an act of congress or from the constitution itself.” | 46 |
| 3 | Radlax Gateway Hotel, LLC v. Amalgamated Bank | green | “the general/specific canon is perhaps most frequently applied to statutes in which a general permission or prohibition is contradicted by a specific prohibition or permission.” | 26 |
| 4 | Clinton v. City of New York | green | “there is no provision in the constitution that authorizes the president to enact, to amend, or to repeal statutes.” | 11 |
| 5 | Leo M. Eisel v. Secretary of the Army. Gary S. Gelber v. Secretary of the Air Force | green | “person having custody of the person detained,” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.