Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 20 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Nevitt.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Nevitt Anchor | green | “application of the waiver rule is less rigid where the basis for the objection is the trial judge's conduct.” | 8 |
| 2 | People v. Durr | green | “plain-error analyses under supreme court rules 451(c) and 615(a) are construed identically.” | 4 |
| 3 | People v. Davis | green | “even if we were to find that a constitutional due process error occurred in instructing the jury on felony murder or that the one-good-count presumption is questionable, it would still not require automatic reversal of defendant's murder conviction.” | 4 |
| 4 | People v. Topps | green | “cannot rightly attribute to counsel any damage caused by the unfulfilled opening statement concerning defendant's expected testimony.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.