Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 20 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Raja v. Burns.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Raja v. Burns Anchor | green | “the practice of lumping multiple distinct tasks into a single billing entry - is generally disfavored because it can complicate the district court's task of determining the reasonableness of the billed hours.” | 11 |
| 2 | Holick v. Cellular Sales | green | “courts look to 'both "the quantity and quality of relief obtained,” | 5 |
| 3 | Hugee v. Kimso Apartments, LLC | green | “much closer to a junior associate than the senior partner whose hourly rate he hoped to claim,” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.