Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 19 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from John P. Dickson v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States of America.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | John P. Dickson v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States of America Anchor | green | “in reviewing a conviction under a divisible statute, the categorical approach permits reference to the record of conviction for the limited purpose of determining whether the alien's conviction was under the branch of the statute that permits removal.” | 15 |
| 2 | Omari v. Gonzales | green | “documents not of that kind, including police reports and complaint applications, may not be considered.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.