Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 19 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Bradford-Scott Data Corporation, Inc. v. Physician Computer Network, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bradford-Scott Data Corporation, Inc. v. Physician Computer Network, Inc. Anchor | green | “the litigation may go forward in the district court is precisely what the court of appeals must decide.” | 7 |
| 2 | In Re Haberman Manufacturing Co. | green | “the circuit court had a discretion to grant or refuse” | 3 |
| 3 | Smith v. Vulcan Iron Works | green | “often exercised by other courts of chancery.” | 3 |
| 4 | Smith v. Vulcan Iron Works | green | “to take further proceedings in the cause, unless in its discretion it orders them to be stayed, pending the appeal.” | 3 |
| 5 | ALEXANDER McKENZIE | green | “inherent power . . . to stay or supersede proceedings on appeal” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.