Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 224 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Ralph Rogers v. Michael Fair.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ralph Rogers v. Michael Fair Anchor | green | “to succeed, the moving party must show that there is an absence of evidence to support the nonmoving party's position.” | 125 |
| 2 | Ralph Rogers v. Michael Fair | green | “shifts to the nonmoving party to establish the existence of an issue of fact that could affect the outcome of the litigation and from which a reasonable jury could find for the nonmoving party.” | 39 |
| 3 | Maria De Los Angeles SANCHEZ, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Carlos ALVARADO, Et Al., Defendants, Appellees | green | “the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” | 18 |
| 4 | Lawless v. Steward Health Care Sys., LLC | green | “summary judgment is warranted if the record, construed in the light most flattering to the nonmovant, 'presents no genuine issue as to any material fact and reflects the movant's entitlement to judgment as a matter of law.” | 17 |
| 5 | Pedro L. Rodriguez-Pinto v. Cirilo Tirado-Delgado | green | “in this context, 'genuine' means that the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could resolve the point in favor of the nonmoving party.” | 15 |
| 6 | Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Marcelino Roldan Fonseca | green | “requires nonmovants to submit evidence that would be admissible at trial to oppose properly submitted motions for summary judgment.” | 10 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.