Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 19 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Mirpad, LLC v. California Insurance Guarantee Ass'n.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mirpad, LLC v. California Insurance Guarantee Ass'n Anchor | green | “if coverage depends on an unresolved dispute over a factual question, the very existence of that dispute would establish a possibility of coverage and thus a duty to defend.” | 9 |
| 2 | Rocky Mountain Farmers Union v. Richard W. Corey | green | “the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” | 4 |
| 3 | Interstate Bakeries Corp. v. OneBeacon Insurance Company | green | “it is conceivable that 'nature's own' could serve as a slogan,” | 3 |
| 4 | Ringler Associates Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Co. | green | “only the underlying lawsuits' ancillary claims of defamation potentially fell within the policy's 'personal' or 'advertising' injury coverage” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.