Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 19 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Andrew Cortez Crater v. George M. Galaza.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Andrew Cortez Crater v. George M. Galaza Anchor | green | “has a direct, personal, substantial pecuniary interest in reaching a conclusion against one of the litigants,” | 9 |
| 2 | Andrew Cortez Crater v. George M. Galaza | green | “supreme court precedent reveals only three circumstances in which an appearance of bias - as opposed to evidence of actual bias - necessitates recusal.” | 7 |
| 3 | Hurles v. Superior Court | green | “submit evidence to the trial court regarding customary practice in defense of capital cases,” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.