Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 19 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Lamont Wilson v. Dollar General Corporation.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lamont Wilson v. Dollar General Corporation Anchor | green | “a leave request will not be unreasonable on its face so long as it (1) is for a limited, finite period of time; (2) consists of accrued paid leave or unpaid leave; and (3) is shown to be likely to achieve a level of success that will enable the individual to perform the essentia…” | 9 |
| 2 | Kitchen v. Summers Continuous Care Center, LLC | green | “additional medical leave is a reasonable accommodation only where it is 'finite and will be reasonably likely to enable the employee to return to work.” | 6 |
| 3 | Bryant v. Better Business Bureau of Greater Maryland, Inc. | green | “denial of a 'reasonable accommodation' alone is discrimination.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.