Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 26 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Schubert v. Lucent Technologies Inc. (In Re Winstar Communications, Inc.).
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Schubert v. Lucent Technologies Inc. (In Re Winstar Communications, Inc.) Anchor | green | “a claim falls within the bankruptcy court's 'related to' jurisdiction if the outcome of that proceeding could conceivably have any effect on the estate being administered in bankruptcy.” | 7 |
| 2 | Union Trust Philadelphia, LLC v. Singer Equipment Co. (In Re Union Trust Philadelphia, LLC) | green | “in the bankruptcy context, reasonable likelihood of success is equivalent to the debtor's ability to successfully reorganize.” | 6 |
| 3 | W.R. Grace & Co. v. Chakarian | green | “what will or will not be sufficiently related to a bankruptcy to warrant the exercise of subject matter jurisdiction is a matter that must be developed on a fact-specific, case-by-case basis.” | 5 |
| 4 | Rahl v. Bande | green | “there is a presumption in favor of the exercise of federal jurisdiction and against abstention.” | 5 |
| 5 | Rahl v. Bande | green | “whether to abstain or remand on equitable grounds” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.