Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 219 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Darnell v. City of New York.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Darnell v. City of New York Anchor | green | “a pretrial detainee's claims of unconstitutional conditions of confinement are governed by the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment, rather than the cruel and unusual punishments clause of the eight amendment.” | 127 |
| 2 | Patterson v. County of Oneida | green | “show that the challenged acts were performed pursuant to a municipal policy or custom.” | 47 |
| 3 | Vippolis v. Village of Haverstraw | green | “prove the existence of a municipal policy or custom in order to show that the municipality took some action that caused his injuries beyond merely employing the misbehaving officer.” | 40 |
| 4 | Vippolis v. Village of Haverstraw | green | “(1) 'the existence of a municipal policy or custom ... that caused his injuries beyond merely employing the misbehaving officers'; and (2) 'a causal connection-an” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.