Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 17 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Guidry.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Guidry Anchor | green | “to establish a violation of 922(g)(1), the government must prove three elements beyond a reasonable doubt: (1) that the defendant previously had been convicted of a felony; (2) that he possessed a firearm; and (3) that the firearm traveled in or affected interstate commerce.” | 5 |
| 2 | United States v. Pamela Jo Chandler | green | “tried only on charges presented in a grand jury indictment.” | 5 |
| 3 | United States v. Daniels | green | “this circuit applies plain error review to forfeited constructive amendment arguments.” | 4 |
| 4 | United States v. Ekanem | green | “any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.