Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 canonical passages across 11 cases, quoted by 210 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Ruston Gas Turbines, Inc. v. Donaldson Company, Inc., Defendant-Third Party v. Corchran, Inc., Third-Party.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ruston Gas Turbines, Inc. v. Donaldson Company, Inc., Defendant-Third Party v. Corchran, Inc., Third-Party Anchor | green | “the non-resident's 'purposeful availment' must be such that the defendant 'should reasonably anticipate being haled into court' in the forum state.” | 39 |
| 2 | David H. Stuart and Richard A. Whitaker v. Richard G. Spademan | green | “an individual's transaction of business within the state solely as a corporate officer does not create personal jurisdiction over that individual though the state has in personam jurisdiction over the corporation.” | 35 |
| 3 | Luv N' Care, Ltd. v. Insta-Mix, Inc. | green | “where a defendant challenges personal jurisdiction, the party seeking to invoke the power of the court bears the burden of proving that jurisdiction exists.” | 34 |
| 4 | Panda Brandywine Corporation v. Potomac Electric Power Company | green | “has 'purposefully directed its activities at the forum state and the litigation results from alleged injuries that arise out of or relate to those activities.” | 31 |
| 5 | Quick Technologies, Inc. v. The Sage Group Plc And, Sage Us Holdings, Inc. Quick Technologies, Inc. v. Sage Software, Inc. | green | “when the district court rules on a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction 'without an evidentiary hearing, the plaintiff may bear his burden by presenting a prima facie case that personal jurisdiction is proper.” | 19 |
| 6 | Mink v. AAAA Development LLC | green | “when a nonresident defendant challenges personal jurisdiction, the plaintiff bears the burden of establishing the district court's jurisdiction over the defendant.” | 12 |
| 7 | Gundle Lining Construction Corporation v. Adams County Asphalt, Inc. | green | “examine the relationship among the defendant, the forum, and the litigation to determine whether maintaining the suit offends traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice.” | 10 |
| 8 | Thomas W. Wilson v. David W. Belin and G. Robert Blakey | green | “contacts that give rise to 'specific' personal jurisdiction and those that give rise to 'general' personal jurisdiction.” | 9 |
| 9 | Ford v. Mentor Worldwide, LLC | green | “the fifth circuit has characterized the 'continuous and systematic contacts' test as a 'difficult one to meet.” | 9 |
| 10 | Carol Bullion v. Larrian Gillespie, M.D. | green | “proof by preponderance of the evidence is not required.” | 8 |
| 11 | ITL International, Inc. v. Constenla, S.A. | green | “the court must accept as true all uncontroverted allegations in the complaint and must resolve any factual disputes in favor of the plaintiff.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.