Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 17 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Morris v. County of Marin.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Morris v. County of Marin Anchor | green | “the 'directory' or 'mandatory' designation does not refer to whether a particular statutory requirement is 'permissive' or 'obligatory,' but instead simply denotes whether the failure to comply with a particular procedural step will or will not have the effect of invalidating th…” | 8 |
| 2 | Coy v. Superior Court | green | “was not called upon to do so . . . while evidence of reasonable cause stood unchallenged in the record” | 3 |
| 3 | San Dieguito Union High School District v. Commission on Professional Competence | green | “strong presumption of correctness” | 3 |
| 4 | Pedro v. City of Los Angeles | green | “evidence that a rational trier of fact could find to be reasonable, credible, and of solid value.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.