Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 250 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San Francisco.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San Francisco Anchor | green | “balancing the need to search against the invasion which the search entails.” | 105 |
| 2 | Olmstead v. United States | red | “the most comprehensive of rights and the right most valued by civilized men.” | 104 |
| 3 | Colonnade Catering Corp. v. United States | green | “where congress has authorized inspection but made no rules governing the procedure that inspectors must follow, the fourth amendment and its various restrictive rules apply.” | 31 |
| 4 | Colonnade Catering Corp. v. United States | green | “congress has broad power to design such powers of inspection under the liquor laws as it deems necessary to meet the evils at hand.” | 10 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.