Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 17 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Henok Araya v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Henok Araya v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Anchor | green | “ordinarily, the plaintiff is entitled to select the forum in which he wishes to proceed.” | 9 |
| 2 | Smith v. Hendricks | green | “courts must strictly construe removal statutes, resolving any ambiguities regarding the existence of removal jurisdiction in favor of remand.” | 4 |
| 3 | Breathe Dc v. Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company | green | “given the lack of controlling precedent in this circuit . . . and notwithstanding the thrust of the opinions of the district courts in this circuit, defendants did not lack an 'objectively reasonable basis for removal.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.