Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Kittelson v. Dretke.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kittelson v. Dretke Anchor | green | “and the state court to which the prisoner would have to present his claims in order to exhaust them would find the claims procedurally barred.” | 6 |
| 2 | Michael Gonzales v. Lorie Davis, Director | green | “show cause for the default and actual prejudice, or that a miscarriage of justice will occur if the federal court does not consider the claim.” | 6 |
| 3 | Michael Gonzales v. Lorie Davis, Director | green | “and a miscarriage of justice in this context means that the petitioner is actually innocent of the crime of which he was convicted.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.