Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from TEXAS v. FLORIDA Et Al..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TEXAS v. FLORIDA Et Al. Anchor | green | “while one's statements may supply evidence of the intention requisite to establish domicile at a given place of residence, they cannot supply the fact of residence there... and they are of slight weight when they conflict with the fact.” | 8 |
| 2 | Francis v. Goodman | green | “are not at liberty to overlook limitations on their subject matter,” | 8 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.