Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re Paul Chris Gianakas, Debtor. Karen Gianakas v. Paul Chris Gianakas.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re Paul Chris Gianakas, Debtor. Karen Gianakas v. Paul Chris Gianakas Anchor | green | “an obligation that serves to maintain daily necessities such as food, housing and transportation is indicative of a debt intended to be in the nature of support.” | 10 |
| 2 | Rankin v. Alloway (In Re Alloway) | green | “whether the support award would be inadequate absent the assumption” | 3 |
| 3 | In Re Anthony | green | “sets forth ten categories of expenses and claims that are entitled to priority payment in a bankruptcy case.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.