Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Washington v. Klem.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Washington v. Klem Anchor | green | “states that 'no government shall impose a substantial burden on the religious exercise of a person residing in or confined to an institution . . . even if the burden results from a rule of general applicability,' unless the government demonstrates that the burden is 'in furthera…” | 9 |
| 2 | Mitchell Garraway v. Harley Lappin | green | “that there is a prison policy impinging on his first amendment rights.” | 4 |
| 3 | Williams v. Secretary Pennsylvania Department of Corrections | green | “williams's free exercise and equal protection claims required him to prove that defendants' conduct was not 'reasonably related to legitimate penological interests' under the four factors set forth in turner.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.