Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Reader's Digest Assn. v. Superior Court.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Reader's Digest Assn. v. Superior Court Anchor | green | “the failure to conduct a thorough and objective investigation, standing alone, does not prove actual malice, nor even necessarily raise a triable issue of fact on that controversy.” | 11 |
| 2 | Antonovich v. Superior Court | green | “from this evidence the trier of fact was entitled to find that antonovich's 'inaction was a product of a deliberate decision not to acquire knowledge of facts that might confirm the probable falsity of the subject charges,' which amounts to a 'purposeful avoidance of the truth' …” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.