Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Hafdahl v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hafdahl v. State Anchor | green | “brady and its progeny do not require prosecuting authorities to disclose exculpatory information to defendants that the state does not have in its possession and that is not known to exist.” | 13 |
| 2 | Anthony Terrell Latson v. State | green | “proves to you individually kind of in your heart, in your mind that the defendant is guilty” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.