Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Carter.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Carter Anchor | green | “had an objectively reasonable belief that the magistrate had a 'substantial basis' for determining the existence of probable cause.” | 11 |
| 2 | United States v. Hoffmann | green | “the authorizing official had a 'substantial basis' for finding probable cause.” | 3 |
| 3 | United States v. Monroe | green | “a deferential standard of review is appropriate to further the fourth amendment's strong preference for searches conducted pursuant to a warrant. . . . close calls will be resolved in favor of sustaining the magistrate's decision.” | 1 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.