Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Grandin.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Grandin Anchor | green | “failed to demonstrate that 'the plea bargaining process was infected by the allegedly ineffective assistance or that defendant entered the plea because of the attorney's allegedly poor performance” | 9 |
| 2 | People v. Brito | green | “the statement by the identified citizen informant that was against the informant's 'own penal interest constituted reliable information for the purposes of supplying probable cause” | 4 |
| 3 | People v. Adams | green | “nothing in the plea allocution called into question defendant's admitted guilt or the voluntariness of the plea” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.