Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Mary Jane Kerr SELGAS, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC., and Whadzen Carrasquillo, Defendants, Appellants.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mary Jane Kerr SELGAS, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC., and Whadzen Carrasquillo, Defendants, Appellants Anchor | green | “strong evidence of a lapse in judgment,” | 5 |
| 2 | Tanca v. Nordberg | green | “congress partially overruled price waterhouse in the 1991 act by allowing a finding of liability and limited relief to plaintiffs in mixed motive cases.” | 4 |
| 3 | Mary Jane Kerr SELGAS, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC., and Whadzen Carrasquillo, Defendants, Appellants | green | “trial courts have discretion to fashion awards in title vii cases so as to fully compensate a plaintiff in a manner that suits the specific facts of the case” | 4 |
| 4 | Sarah M. Goostree, (84-5752), (84-5869) v. State of Tennessee, Montgomery County, Tennessee, (84-5869), Montgomery County Quarterly Court, (84-5752) | green | “the mere showing that 'sex was a factor' rather than a 'but for' factor is insufficient to establish liability under title vii.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.