Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from James Clark v. Amoco Production Co., Etc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | James Clark v. Amoco Production Co., Etc. Anchor | green | “to qualify for dismissal under rule 12(b)(6), a complaint must on its face show a bar to relief.” | 11 |
| 2 | Danny Thomas v. Raymond Smith, Houston Independent School District, and Joan Raymond | green | “it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.