Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 canonical passages across 8 cases, quoted by 197 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Sands v. Ridefilm Corp..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sands v. Ridefilm Corp. Anchor | green | “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” | 58 |
| 2 | Waldo G. Vazquez v. Carlos Lopez-Rosario | green | “evidence that is inadmissible at trial, such as inadmissible hearsay, may not be considered on summary judgment.” | 35 |
| 3 | Victor E. Simas v. First Citizens' Federal Credit Union and Barbara M.W. Silva | green | “credibility determinations are for the factfinder at trial, not for the court at summary judgment.” | 30 |
| 4 | Alberto Dominguez-Cruz and Nydia Negron-Ramos v. Suttle Caribe, Inc. | green | “court should not engage in credibility assessments.” | 27 |
| 5 | Poulis Minott v. Smith | green | “in ruling on a motion for summary judgment, the court must view 'the facts in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, drawing all reasonable inferences in that party's favor.” | 21 |
| 6 | Perez-De-Munoz v. Volvo Car Corp. | green | “must concern facts as opposed to conclusions, assumptions, or surmise” | 13 |
| 7 | Quinones v. Houser Buick | green | “supporting evidence to which he could testify in court” | 9 |
| 8 | Genaro Quiles-Quiles v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service | green | “in proper circumstances, the causation element may be established by evidence that there was a temporal proximity between the behavior in question and the employee's complaint.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.