Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Citizens for Appropriate Rural v. Anthony Foxx.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Citizens for Appropriate Rural v. Anthony Foxx Anchor | green | “a party who fails to comply with deadlines related to discovery or otherwise forestalls prosecution of their own case is not entitled to seek additional discovery when the opposing side moves for summary judgment.” | 7 |
| 2 | Felix A. Olivieri v. Matt L. Rodriguez | green | “pretrial discovery is time consuming and expensive; it protracts and complicates litigation; and judges are to be commended rather than criticized for keeping tight reins on it.” | 4 |
| 3 | In re Dairy Farmers of America, Inc. Cheese Antitrust Litigation | green | “where the request 'was based on nothing more than mere speculation and would amount to a fishing expedition.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.