Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Lozada v. Warden, State Prison.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lozada v. Warden, State Prison Anchor | green | “would be meaningless if it did not embody a requirement that counsel be effective as well as merely present.” | 5 |
| 2 | McBeth v. M.D.K. | green | “it is not enough that a mother indicate a desire to improve.” | 4 |
| 3 | In Re Dd | green | “failure to follow through with provided services” | 3 |
| 4 | In Interest of Jc | green | “several states have recognized the viability of a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel in termination of parental rights proceedings.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.