Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Holston v. Sisters of Third Order of St. Francis.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Holston v. Sisters of Third Order of St. Francis Anchor | green | “the trial judge was in the best position to evaluate the relevance of the evidence” | 6 |
| 2 | Prairie v. Snow Valley Health Resources, Inc. | green | “a witness is not required to use the exact words previously used in a discovery deposition” | 3 |
| 3 | Cetera v. DiFilippo | green | “a treating physician is considered a rule 213(f)(2) independent expert witness.” | 3 |
| 4 | Verbance v. Altman | green | “a trial judge must have considerable leeway in deciding how to go about determining whether a particular medical expert's testimony is reliable.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.