Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Jonathan Cruz-Guzman v. William P. Barr.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jonathan Cruz-Guzman v. William P. Barr Anchor | green | “this is a question of motive, not just simple causation.” | 6 |
| 2 | Beky Izamar Mazariegos-Rodas v. Merrick B. Garland | green | “will uphold a bia determination as long as it is supported by reasonable, substantial, and probative evidence on the record considered as a whole.” | 5 |
| 3 | Ana Sanchez Sebastian-Sebastian v. Merrick B. Garland | green | “an asylum claim requires that a statutorily protected ground be 'at least one central reason' for alleged persecution.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.